I'm still catching up from Midwinter, or at least it feels like it. As soon as I got back, I had to dig into a grant narrative. It's the sort of work that I live for--last-minute, adrenaline-soaked productivity in which I brainstorm, send a million emails, bounce and reject ideas, talk outloud to myself, laud my brilliance, curse my procrastination, extract information from our business manager that I should keep handy, but only need every 18 months or so, and beg for new outside partners. For once, I had it done before the very last minute, even letting it sit on my desk for a day, in quadruplicate, before Fed-exing it. Now it's gone and in the loving hands of the grant readers at NVR. It's a good one, too!
So, here's a smattering of this 'n that, a fluffy placeholder to assuage my guilt over not regularly offering more substantial content.
I used to regularly check referring URLs for absurd searches leading to the blog, but soon learned that it was the same ones over and over (hats, raccoon food, hermione granger xxx). Yesterday, during a random check, I got a really good one via a Google search:
How to handle a personnel situation where a staff member farts loudly and often
Now, that's not a good situation for anyone, not the offending pooter or his or her colleagues. While I'm pretty sure there's no solution offered within the contents of this blog, I hope that the air is, er, cleared soon for all concerned.
I have been reading quite a bit, and was finally able to pull myself away from my obsession with 1950s vintage doctor/hospital romance. I've read through section 3 of the OCLC Perceptions report, and for any of you who have been talking about how the library is not just about books, I suggest you have a look-see at what everyone else thinks. It really gave me pause and I hope to find time for sufficient mastication. It's a lot to digest.
Katharine Hepburn: The Untold Story by James Robert Parish was plucked off the shelf to satisfy my voyeuristic tendencies and fondness for celebrity biography. I was curious to see what new material Parish could possibly offer on Hepburn, and was not disappointed. The book is part of of the Advocate Life Stories series, which issues biographies of high-profile GLBT people. I'd read tidbits over the years that hinted at Hepburn's very secret private life, but Parish gives a more fully developed treatment of Hepburn as a bisexual woman and questions the whole premise of the Hepburn/Tracy romance-of-the-century story. There's also plenty of transgender subtext. As an editor, I was a bit distracted by some less than careful writing and editing, but overall, it was a worthwhile read (okay....I devoured it in two days).
Last night, I started Julie and Julia: 365 Days, 524 Recipes, 1 Tiny Apartment Kitchen, by Julie Powell. It's funny and entertaining enough to have kept me reading while nursing a migraine last night, and I imagine I'll polish it off tonight. Powell has done what many of us only dream of--parlaying a blog into a book contract. In the midst of an extended life crisis, Powell decided to cook her way through Julia Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking in one year, recording the feat in a blog called the Julie/Julia project. It works as angsty, comedic memoir, and it's great food writing for those of us with ill-equipped kitchens and unsophisticated palates.
My favorite title among recent reads, however, is Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers by Mary Roach. Never mind that it was a perfect book for someone who has had to quelll the urge to stop by the coroner's office to see if there were any autopsies going and and whose favorite reference book is Mosby's Medical Dictionary (notable for its lavish color photos of disease and injury). Somehow, Roach managed to write a book about a gruesome, squirm-inducing topic that is impeccably researched, devoid of sensationalism and damn funny.
I owe David Rothman a treatise on literacy, from a public library perspective. Branko Collin, an occassional contributor to the Teleread blog, wonders about the assumptions made about the definition of literacy and adds:
Other assumptions seem to be for one, that literacy is good, and for another, that anybody supportive of the digital library must support literacy and denounce any observed decline. But why should digital libraries support a product that patrons do not want, and why should they support patrons that are clearly not interested in the product on offer?
Anything I can pass along?